Weekly ecommerce tips, deals & news.
Keyword difficulty is a score estimating how hard it would be to rank on page one for a search term. Most SEO tools present it on a scale of 0 to 100, where higher means harder. The score is built mainly from the strength of the pages already ranking. Treat it as a rough weather forecast, not a guarantee.
Picture a race where the finish line is page one of Google. Keyword difficulty does not measure how far away that line is. Instead, it measures how fast the runners already standing there happen to be.
That distinction explains most of the confusion around the metric. A low score means the current leaders look beatable. It says nothing about whether you personally can beat them.
Most tools build the number from the backlink profiles of the pages currently ranking. They count how many other websites link to those pages, then translate that into a 0 to 100 figure.
So a keyword scores high when the top ten results have thousands of referring domains between them. It scores low when the top ten are thin pages nobody has linked to.
Backlinks are used because they correlate with rankings and are measurable at scale. Ahrefs notes a positive correlation between the number of sites linking to a page and its search traffic. That correlation is the entire foundation of the score.
Each tool crawls a different slice of the web and weights the inputs its own way. One might lean heavily on referring domains, while another folds in page authority or on-page signals.
The practical rule is simple. Never compare a difficulty score from one tool against a score from another.
Pick one tool and stay with it. What matters is the ranking of keywords relative to each other inside that tool, not the absolute figure. In short, the score is useful as a sorting device rather than a measurement.
The blind spots matter more than the number. Four things sit outside almost every difficulty calculation.
Intent is the one that catches store owners most often. Always open the actual SERP before trusting a score. If every result is a product category page, a blog article will not rank there whatever the number says.
Read difficulty against your own domain rating rather than in isolation. A newer store should generally stay in the lower bands and build upward.
The odds justify that caution. Ahrefs studied 14 billion pages and found 96.55% get zero traffic from Google. Meanwhile only 1.74% of new pages reach the top ten within a year.
Age is part of it too. Roughly 72.9% of pages in the top ten are more than three years old. So patience is a genuine ranking factor, not just advice.
A difficulty score summarises ten results as one number. That summary hides the shape of the page, which is often where the opportunity sits.
Consider two keywords that both score 35. In the first, all ten results are evenly matched mid-sized sites. In the second, three giants sit at the top and positions four to ten are weak.
The second keyword is far more attractive despite the identical score. You are not trying to beat everyone, only enough of them to reach the first page.
That distinction matters because the first page is where the traffic lives. Ahrefs puts 96.6% of all clicks on page one results. Position eight still counts, while position twelve mostly does not.
So scan the weakest results, not the strongest. Ask whether you could plausibly out-write the page sitting at number seven. That is a much more useful question than the score itself.
Imagine a small store called Ember Kitchenware selling cast iron cookware. They are two years old with a modest link profile and a few hundred monthly visitors.
Research surfaces three candidates. Each looks appealing for a different reason.
The owner opens each SERP before deciding anything. The first is wall-to-wall national retailers and review sites, so the difficulty score was telling the truth.
The second looks winnable on score alone. However, the results are dominated by long-established cooking publications with years of accumulated links. A mid-forties score hides a very old field.
The third is different. Two of the top results are thin forum threads, and one is an outdated blog post. That is a genuine gap rather than a low number.
Ember targets the third term first and builds a genuinely useful page. They add compatibility details, weight, and base flatness, because that is what the searcher is worried about.
Then they repeat the pattern. Ten similar long-tail keywords at low difficulty add up to more traffic than one impossible term.
Those small terms are also where most of the web lives. Ahrefs found 94.74% of keywords get 10 monthly searches or fewer. Ignoring them means ignoring nearly the whole search landscape.
The flagship term stays on the list, just later. Once Ember has authority from twenty winnable pages, the mid-forties keywords stop looking impossible.
Search volume estimates how many people look for a term each month. Difficulty estimates how hard it is to reach them. The two are usually correlated, which is exactly the problem.
Chasing volume alone is the classic beginner mistake. High-volume terms attract every competitor in the category, so the traffic looks great and never arrives.
Chasing low difficulty alone has the opposite failure. You can rank first for something nobody searches and gain nothing at all.
It also helps to remember that volume is an estimate. Tools infer it from clickstream samples, so the figure carries real uncertainty. A term listed at 200 searches might genuinely be 90 or 400.
Neither number is precise, then. Both are directional, and using them as if they were exact is how keyword plans go wrong.
The useful move is to weigh both against commercial value. A term with 90 monthly searches and clear buying intent can beat one with 9,000 casual searches. For marketplaces in particular, our guide to SEO for marketplaces covers how that plays out across many product pages.
It depends entirely on your site’s authority, so there is no universal threshold. A brand new store is usually safest under about 20. An established store with a solid link profile can push into the 30s and 40s.
The better habit is to check which of your existing pages already rank. Note the difficulty of those terms, and you have a personal ceiling based on evidence rather than guesswork.
Occasionally, but do not plan around it. It happens when the ranking pages badly misread intent and you answer the question properly. It also happens in very fresh topics where nobody has built links yet.
For most commercial terms, though, the score is high precisely because links are the barrier. Building topical depth across related pages is the more reliable route.
Yes, because it is recalculated from whoever is ranking right now. A term gets easier when a strong competitor removes a page. It gets harder when a major brand starts targeting it.
So recheck your priority keywords a couple of times a year. Scores gathered long ago may describe a search results page that no longer exists.
Keyword difficulty is a shortlist tool, not a verdict. Use it to sort a long list quickly, then open the actual results page before you commit. For most stores, a steady run of low-difficulty wins builds the authority that makes the hard keywords reachable later.
Copyright © StoreOwnerTips.com. All Rights Reserved.
